Ikiru

What’s new

Legal paperwork that quietly decides who owns what

∙ 2 min read Public
Daryl Wehner
in Startups
Path ∙ The oversights that compound Part 2 of 3

Contractor agreements and IP assignment paperwork rarely feel urgent early on. Skipping them can leave a company’s ownership of its own work genuinely unclear.

Legal paperwork that quietly decides who owns what

A contractor builds an early version of a product’s core feature, gets paid, and moves on to other work. Nobody thinks much about the paperwork at the time, since the relationship felt straightforward and the payment was clear. Without a signed intellectual property assignment, the company’s legal claim to that piece of work can be genuinely murkier than anyone involved assumed.

Contractor agreements and IP assignment paperwork rarely feel urgent early on. Skipping them can leave a company’s ownership of its own work genuinely unclear.

Why this gap is so easy to miss early on

Default assumptions about work-for-hire vary by jurisdiction and by the specific nature of the work, and they do not automatically guarantee that a company owns everything a contractor built simply because the contractor was paid. Founders reasonably assume that payment settles ownership, and in many cases it effectively does, informally, until a dispute, an acquisition, or a due diligence process specifically asks for documentation proving it — documentation that, without a signed agreement, may not clearly exist.

Recognizing when the team, not the product, is the risk

∙ 4 min read Public
Damian Erdman
in Founders

Founders default to diagnosing struggles as product or market problems. Sometimes the actual constraint is the founding team itself, and that is harder to admit.

Recognizing when the team, not the product, is the risk

When a company struggles, the default diagnosis almost always points outward — the market wasn’t ready, the product needed another iteration, the timing was wrong. These explanations are sometimes accurate, and they are also more comfortable than a harder possibility that gets considered far less often: that the constraint holding the company back is the founding team itself, its dynamics, or a specific gap in what it can collectively do.

When a small, loud user base fools a whole team

∙ 3 min read Public
Path ∙ Finding product-market fit Part 6 of 8

A handful of vocal, enthusiastic early users can convince a team that fit exists broadly, when the enthusiasm may not extend past that small, unusual group.

A small group of genuinely enthusiastic early users provides some of the most encouraging feedback a team ever receives, and it can also be one of the most misleading signals available, precisely because enthusiasm feels like the strongest possible evidence of fit while sometimes representing only a narrow, unusual slice of the market.

The unremarkable habits that keep a company alive past year three

∙ 1 min read Paid ∙ Unlock
Brenda Reichel
in Startups
Path ∙ Running a startup, day to day Part 3 of 3

Companies that survive their first few years rarely credit a single brilliant decision. They tend to credit a handful of boring habits, kept consistently.

The unremarkable habits that keep a company alive past year three

Founders looking back on a company that survived its first three years rarely point to a single brilliant strategic decision as the reason. They tend to point instead to a small set of unremarkable habits, kept consistently, that quietly prevented the kind of operational failures that sink otherwise promising companies.

Featured articles See all